Jonathan Harris demonstrates that the leaders of Stalin's Secretariat clashed sharply over the nature of the Communist party's 'leadership' of the Soviet state in the period between 1939 … Altro …
Jonathan Harris demonstrates that the leaders of Stalin's Secretariat clashed sharply over the nature of the Communist party's 'leadership' of the Soviet state in the period between 1939 and 1948. The term 'party leadership' is generally misunderstood; it does not refer to the activities of the party as a whole, but to the efforts of its full time officials (the 'inner party') to direct the activities of the members of the party who manned the Soviet state (the 'outer party'). This study argues that A. Zhdanov and G. Malenkov, the two junior Secretaries of the CC/VKP(B) who directed the two major bureaucratic divisions of the Secretariat for most of the period under review, supported diametrically opposed conceptions of the leadership to be provided by the party's officials. A. Zhdanov argued that they should give priority to the ideological education of all members of the party and should allow the Communists who manned the state considerable autonomy in their administration of the five-year plans. In direct contrast, G. Malenkov, who directed the cadres directorate for most of the period under review, had little sympathy for ideological education and urged party officials to engage in close and detailed direction of the Communists who directly administered the five-year plans. This study contends that it is possible to illustrate this never-ending conflict by a careful examination of the public discussion of this issue in the various publications controlled by the major divisions of the Secretariat. When examined in conjunction with recently published archival materials, it is possible to pinpoint the linkages between the leadership conflict within the Secretariat, the shifts in the ongoing public discussion, and Stalin's role as the final arbiter in the dispute. Digital Content>E-books>World History>Russia History>Russia History, Lexington Books Digital >16<
BarnesandNoble.com
new in stock. Costi di spedizione:zzgl. Versandkosten., Costi di spedizione aggiuntivi Details...
(*) Libro esaurito significa che il libro non è attualmente disponibile in una qualsiasi delle piattaforme associate che di ricerca.
Jonathan Harris demonstrates that the leaders of Stalin's Secretariat clashed sharply over the nature of the Communist party's 'leadership' of the Soviet state in the period between 1939 … Altro …
Jonathan Harris demonstrates that the leaders of Stalin's Secretariat clashed sharply over the nature of the Communist party's 'leadership' of the Soviet state in the period between 1939 and 1948.The term 'party leadership' is generally misunderstood; it does not refer to the activities of the party as a whole, but to the efforts of its full time officials (the 'inner party') to direct the activities of the members of the party who manned the Soviet state (the 'outer party').This study argues that A. Zhdanov and G. Malenkov, the two junior Secretaries of the CC/VKP(B) who directed the two major bureaucratic divisions of the Secretariat for most of the period under review, supported diametrically opposed conceptions of the leadership to be provided by the party's officials.A. Zhdanov argued that they should give priority to the ideological education of all members of the party and should allow the Communists who manned the state considerable autonomy in their administration of the five-year plans.In direct contrast, G. Malenkov, who directed the cadres directorate for most of the period under review, had little sympathy for ideological education and urged party officials to engage in close and detailed direction of the Communists who directly administered the five-year plans.This study contends that it is possible to illustrate this never-ending conflict by a careful examination of the public discussion of this issue in the various publications controlled by the major divisions of the Secretariat.When examined in conjunction with recently published archival materials, it is possible to pinpoint the linkages between the leadership conflict within the Secretariat, the shifts in the ongoing public discussion, and Stalin's role as the final arbiter in the dispute.; PDF; History & Transport > Humanities, Lexington Books<
hive.co.uk
No. 9780739130148. Costi di spedizione:Instock, Despatched same working day before 3pm, zzgl. Versandkosten., Costi di spedizione aggiuntivi Details...
(*) Libro esaurito significa che il libro non è attualmente disponibile in una qualsiasi delle piattaforme associate che di ricerca.
This book attempts to demonstrate that the leaders of Stalin's Secretariat clashed sharply and continuously over the nature of the Communist party's 'leadership' of the Soviet state betwe… Altro …
This book attempts to demonstrate that the leaders of Stalin's Secretariat clashed sharply and continuously over the nature of the Communist party's 'leadership' of the Soviet state between 1939 and 1948.This study reconceptualizes the entire question of 'party-state' relations in the SSR's political system and therefore provides an original interpretation of a critical period in the development of the Stalinist political system.; EPUB; History & Transport > Humamities > Regional & national history > European history, Free Press<
hive.co.uk
No. 9780739130148. Costi di spedizione:Instock, Despatched same working day before 3pm, zzgl. Versandkosten., Costi di spedizione aggiuntivi Details...
(*) Libro esaurito significa che il libro non è attualmente disponibile in una qualsiasi delle piattaforme associate che di ricerca.
Jonathan Harris demonstrates that the leaders of Stalin's Secretariat clashed sharply over the nature of the Communist party's 'leadership' of the Soviet state in the period between 1939 … Altro …
Jonathan Harris demonstrates that the leaders of Stalin's Secretariat clashed sharply over the nature of the Communist party's 'leadership' of the Soviet state in the period between 1939 and 1948. The term 'party leadership' is generally misunderstood; it does not refer to the activities of the party as a whole, but to the efforts of its full time officials (the 'inner party') to direct the activities of the members of the party who manned the Soviet state (the 'outer party'). This study argues that A. Zhdanov and G. Malenkov, the two junior Secretaries of the CC/VKP(B) who directed the two major bureaucratic divisions of the Secretariat for most of the period under review, supported diametrically opposed conceptions of the leadership to be provided by the party's officials. A. Zhdanov argued that they should give priority to the ideological education of all members of the party and should allow the Communists who manned the state considerable autonomy in their administration of the five-year plans. In direct contrast, G. Malenkov, who directed the cadres directorate for most of the period under review, had little sympathy for ideological education and urged party officials to engage in close and detailed direction of the Communists who directly administered the five-year plans. This study contends that it is possible to illustrate this never-ending conflict by a careful examination of the public discussion of this issue in the various publications controlled by the major divisions of the Secretariat. When examined in conjunction with recently published archival materials, it is possible to pinpoint the linkages between the leadership conflict within the Secretariat, the shifts in the ongoing public discussion, and Stalin's role as the final arbiter in the dispute. Digital Content>E-books>World History>Russia History>Russia History, Lexington Books Digital >16<
new in stock. Costi di spedizione:zzgl. Versandkosten., Costi di spedizione aggiuntivi
Jonathan Harris demonstrates that the leaders of Stalin's Secretariat clashed sharply over the nature of the Communist party's 'leadership' of the Soviet state in the period between 1939 … Altro …
Jonathan Harris demonstrates that the leaders of Stalin's Secretariat clashed sharply over the nature of the Communist party's 'leadership' of the Soviet state in the period between 1939 and 1948.The term 'party leadership' is generally misunderstood; it does not refer to the activities of the party as a whole, but to the efforts of its full time officials (the 'inner party') to direct the activities of the members of the party who manned the Soviet state (the 'outer party').This study argues that A. Zhdanov and G. Malenkov, the two junior Secretaries of the CC/VKP(B) who directed the two major bureaucratic divisions of the Secretariat for most of the period under review, supported diametrically opposed conceptions of the leadership to be provided by the party's officials.A. Zhdanov argued that they should give priority to the ideological education of all members of the party and should allow the Communists who manned the state considerable autonomy in their administration of the five-year plans.In direct contrast, G. Malenkov, who directed the cadres directorate for most of the period under review, had little sympathy for ideological education and urged party officials to engage in close and detailed direction of the Communists who directly administered the five-year plans.This study contends that it is possible to illustrate this never-ending conflict by a careful examination of the public discussion of this issue in the various publications controlled by the major divisions of the Secretariat.When examined in conjunction with recently published archival materials, it is possible to pinpoint the linkages between the leadership conflict within the Secretariat, the shifts in the ongoing public discussion, and Stalin's role as the final arbiter in the dispute.; PDF; History & Transport > Humanities, Lexington Books<
No. 9780739130148. Costi di spedizione:Instock, Despatched same working day before 3pm, zzgl. Versandkosten., Costi di spedizione aggiuntivi
This book attempts to demonstrate that the leaders of Stalin's Secretariat clashed sharply and continuously over the nature of the Communist party's 'leadership' of the Soviet state betwe… Altro …
This book attempts to demonstrate that the leaders of Stalin's Secretariat clashed sharply and continuously over the nature of the Communist party's 'leadership' of the Soviet state between 1939 and 1948.This study reconceptualizes the entire question of 'party-state' relations in the SSR's political system and therefore provides an original interpretation of a critical period in the development of the Stalinist political system.; EPUB; History & Transport > Humamities > Regional & national history > European history, Free Press<
- No. 9780739130148. Costi di spedizione:Instock, Despatched same working day before 3pm, zzgl. Versandkosten., Costi di spedizione aggiuntivi
1Poiché alcune piattaforme non trasmettono le condizioni di spedizione e queste possono dipendere dal paese di consegna, dal prezzo di acquisto, dal peso e dalle dimensioni dell'articolo, dall'eventuale iscrizione alla piattaforma, dalla consegna diretta da parte della piattaforma o tramite un fornitore terzo (Marketplace), ecc. è possibile che le spese di spedizione indicate da eurolibro non corrispondano a quelle della piattaforma offerente.
Dati bibliografici del miglior libro corrispondente
Informazioni dettagliate del libro - The Split in Stalin's Secretariat, 1939-1948
EAN (ISBN-13): 9780739130148 Anno di pubblicazione: 1955 Editore: Lexington Books
Libro nella banca dati dal 2007-05-01T01:46:26+02:00 (Zurich) Pagina di dettaglio ultima modifica in 2023-01-30T12:03:32+01:00 (Zurich) ISBN/EAN: 9780739130148
ISBN - Stili di scrittura alternativi: 978-0-7391-3014-8 Stili di scrittura alternativi e concetti di ricerca simili: Autore del libro : harr jonathan, jonathan harris Titolo del libro: before and after stalin, 1939, 1948, split
Altri libri che potrebbero essere simili a questo:
