2012, ISBN: 9783656215530

Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: Middle- and South America, grade: 1,0, Arizona State University (School Of Politics And Global … Altro …

Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: Middle- and South America, grade: 1,0, Arizona State University (School Of Politics And Global Studies), course: Latin American Politics, language: English, abstract: Throughout the latest scholar papers, newspaper or political science journal articles Brazil has been termed 'an upcoming global power' or 'international player' (see Bandeira 2006, O'Neil 2010, Brigagão 2009 and partly Zaverucha 2009). While the term 'upcoming global power' is often linked with aspects of economic, environmental and multilateral engagements (i.e. international organizations or trade regimes) within these articles, it also includes Brazil's self-perceived military power and its role in Latin America (regional level) or even the world (international level). Moreover, scholars critical analyze Brazil's intentions as well as the role Brazil will play on the intentional stage in the upcoming years (see Schneider 1976, Baer 2009 and Vaz 2004). Demands have been made by scholars trying to focus on the multilateral role of Brazil in order to 'control' its behaviour while emphasizing Brazil's repeatedly emerging domestic problems (i.e. inequality, criminalization, corruption or unsteady institutions). Additionally and for this paper most importantly, Brazil's self-perceived role within the international sphere is mainly linked with its regime form, democratic. Therefore scholars argue that with the democratic transition in the late 1980's, domestic actors and groups emerged on the scene, demanding a larger international role in order to sustain, develop and increase Brazil's international reputation and power (see Brigagão 2009, Zaverucha 2009 and Baer 2009 ). Nevertheless it remains worth to question how these demands take place and how they actually cause a change within the country's foreign policy. Additionally, it will be interesting to see how Brazil absorbs and transfers these internal demands in foreign policies, i.e. when we consider theoretical terms like 'peaceful democracy'. How can we operationalize the term 'upcoming superpower'? What are Brazil's main domestic actors and how where these actors influenced in their demands after the democratic transition in 1985? What changes within the domestic area in Brazil after 1985 caused a potential switch in the country's foreign policy? How does the potential new role Brazil plays in the international relations look like? Does it fit in the traditional theoretical perspective we have about democracies or is it an exception? Can we make a general prediction for Latin American new democracies as far as the foreign policy behaviour and self-determination is concerned? eBook Ferdinand Frisch PDF, GRIN, 13.06.2012, GRIN, 2012<

2012, ISBN: 9783656215530

Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: Middle- and South America, grade: 1,0, Arizona State University (School Of Politics And Global … Altro …

Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: Middle- and South America, grade: 1,0, Arizona State University (School Of Politics And Global Studies), course: Latin American Politics, language: English, abstract: Throughout the latest scholar papers, newspaper or political science journal articles Brazil has been termed 'an upcoming global power' or 'international player' (see Bandeira 2006, O'Neil 2010, Brigagão 2009 and partly Zaverucha 2009). While the term 'upcoming global power' is often linked with aspects of economic, environmental and multilateral engagements (i.e. international organizations or trade regimes) within these articles, it also includes Brazil's self-perceived military power and its role in Latin America (regional level) or even the world (international level). Moreover, scholars critical analyze Brazil's intentions as well as the role Brazil will play on the intentional stage in the upcoming years (see Schneider 1976, Baer 2009 and Vaz 2004). Demands have been made by scholars trying to focus on the multilateral role of Brazil in order to 'control' its behaviour while emphasizing Brazil's repeatedly emerging domestic problems (i.e. inequality, criminalization, corruption or unsteady institutions). Additionally and for this paper most importantly, Brazil's self-perceived role within the international sphere is mainly linked with its regime form, democratic. Therefore scholars argue that with the democratic transition in the late 1980's, domestic actors and groups emerged on the scene, demanding a larger international role in order to sustain, develop and increase Brazil's international reputation and power (see Brigagão 2009, Zaverucha 2009 and Baer 2009 ). Nevertheless it remains worth to question how these demands take place and how they actually cause a change within the country's foreign policy. Additionally, it will be interesting to see how Brazil absorbs and transfers these internal demands in foreign policies, i.e. when we consider theoretical terms like 'peaceful democracy'. How can we operationalize the term 'upcoming superpower'? What are Brazil's main domestic actors and how where these actors influenced in their demands after the democratic transition in 1985? What changes within the domestic area in Brazil after 1985 caused a potential switch in the country's foreign policy? How does the potential new role Brazil plays in the international relations look like? Does it fit in the traditional theoretical perspective we have about democracies or is it an exception? Can we make a general prediction for Latin American new democracies as far as the foreign policy behaviour and self-determination is concerned? eBook Ferdinand Frisch PDF, GRIN, 13.06.2012, GRIN, 2012<

2012, ISBN: 9783656215530

Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: Middle- and South America, grade: 1,0, Arizona State University (School Of Politics And Global … Altro …

Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: Middle- and South America, grade: 1,0, Arizona State University (School Of Politics And Global Studies), course: Latin American Politics, language: English, abstract: Throughout the latest scholar papers, newspaper or political science journal articles Brazil has been termed 'an upcoming global power' or 'international player' (see Bandeira 2006, O'Neil 2010, Brigagão 2009 and partly Zaverucha 2009). While the term 'upcoming global power' is often linked with aspects of economic, environmental and multilateral engagements (i.e. international organizations or trade regimes) within these articles, it also includes Brazil's self-perceived military power and its role in Latin America (regional level) or even the world (international level). Moreover, scholars critical analyze Brazil's intentions as well as the role Brazil will play on the intentional stage in the upcoming years (see Schneider 1976, Baer 2009 and Vaz 2004). Demands have been made by scholars trying to focus on the multilateral role of Brazil in order to 'control' its behaviour while emphasizing Brazil's repeatedly emerging domestic problems (i.e. inequality, criminalization, corruption or unsteady institutions). Additionally and for this paper most importantly, Brazil's self-perceived role within the international sphere is mainly linked with its regime form, democratic. Therefore scholars argue that with the democratic transition in the late 1980's, domestic actors and groups emerged on the scene, demanding a larger international role in order to sustain, develop and increase Brazil's international reputation and power (see Brigagão 2009, Zaverucha 2009 and Baer 2009 ). Nevertheless it remains worth to question how these demands take place and how they actually cause a change within the country's foreign policy. Additionally, it will be interesting to see how Brazil absorbs and transfers these internal demands in foreign policies, i.e. when we consider theoretical terms like 'peaceful democracy'. How can we operationalize the term 'upcoming superpower'? What are Brazil's main domestic actors and how where these actors influenced in their demands after the democratic transition in 1985? What changes within the domestic area in Brazil after 1985 caused a potential switch in the country's foreign policy? How does the potential new role Brazil plays in the international relations look like? Does it fit in the traditional theoretical perspective we have about democracies or is it an exception? Can we make a general prediction for Latin American new democracies as far as the foreign policy behaviour and self-determination is concerned? eBook Ferdinand Frisch 13.06.2012, GRIN, GRIN<

ISBN: 9783656215530

Brazil. An emerging democratic global superpower ab 12.99 € als pdf eBook: 1. Auflage. Aus dem Bereich: eBooks, Fachthemen & Wissenschaft, Politikwissenschaft, Medien > Bücher, Brazil. An… Altro …

Brazil. An emerging democratic global superpower ab 12.99 € als pdf eBook: 1. Auflage. Aus dem Bereich: eBooks, Fachthemen & Wissenschaft, Politikwissenschaft, Medien > Bücher, Brazil. An emerging democratic global superpower - eBook als pdf von Ferdinand Frisch - GRIN Verlag - 9783656215530<

ISBN: 9783656215530

Brazil. An emerging democratic global superpower - 1. Auflage: ab 12.99 € Medien > Bücher > E-books